Simone de Beauvoir – Brigitte Bardot and Lolita Syndrome

15 Nov

I love Brigitte Bardot; her presence on the screen is simply delightful, her face is more beautiful than any painting to me, her pouting, her hair, her gaze, the way she walks… enchanting! She doesn’t seem to be acting at all, as Roger Vadim had said, she is just there, being herself. I love her in the early films of her career; “And God Created Woman” (1956), “Love is My Profession” (or “A Case of Adversity, 1957), and La Vérité (1960) in which the handsome Sami Frey plays the role of her lover. The other day I read Simone de Beauvoir’s essay called “Brigitte Bardot and the Lolita Syndrome”, originally published in 1959 and I thought I’d share some interesting passages about Brigitte Bardot as the nymphet, a woman-child, the untamed waif. Everything bellow is from de Beauvoir’s essay, not my words:

Brigitte Bardot in “Une parisienne”, 1957

“Nabokov’s “Lolita” which deals with the relations between a forty-year-old male and a ‘nymphet’ of twelve, was at the top of the best-seller list in England and America for months. The adult woman now inhabits the same world as the man, but the child-woman moves in a universe which he cannot enter. The age difference re-established between them the distance that seems necessary for desire. At least that is what those who have created a new Eve by merging the ‘green fruit’ and ‘femme fatale’ types have pinned their hopes on.

(….) Brigitte Bardot is the most perfect specimen of these ambiguous nymphs. Seen from behind, her slender, muscular, dancer’s body is almost androgynous. Femininity triumphs in her delightful bosom. The long voluptuous tresses of Mélisande flow down to her shoulders, but her hair-do is that of a negligent waif. The line of her lips forms a childish pout, and at the same time those lips are very kissable. She goes about barefooted, she turns up her nose at elegant clothes, jewels, girdles, perfumes, make-up, at all artifice. Yet her walk is lascivious and a saint would sell his soul to the devil merely to watch her dance. It has often been said that her face has only one expression. It is true that the outer world is hardly reflected in it at all and that it does not reveal great inner disturbances. But that air of indifference becomes her. BB has not been marked by experience. Even if she has lived – as in “Love is my profession” – the lessons that life has given her are too confused for her too have learned anything from them. She is without memory, without a past, and, thanks to this ignorance, she retains the perfect innocence that is attributed to a mythical childhood.

(…) Vadim presented her as a ‘a phenomenon of nature.’ ‘She doesn’t act’, he said. ‘She exists.’ (…) She was moody and capricious. (…) She was described as a creature of instinct, as yielding blindly to her impulses. She would suddenly take a dislike to the decoration of her room and then and there would pull down the hangings and start repainting the furniture. She is temperamental, changeable and unpredictable, and though she retains the limpidity of childhood, she has also preserved its mystery. A strange little creature, all in all; and this image does not depart from the traditional myth of femininity. She appears as a force of nature, dangerous so long as she remains untamed, but it is up to the male to domesticate her. She is kind, she is good-hearted. In all her films she loves animals. If she ever makes anyone suffer, it is never deliberately.

Her flightiness and slips of behaviour are excusable because she is so young and because of circumstances. Juliette had an unhappy childhood; Yvette, in ‘Love is my profession’, is a victim of society. If they ever go astray, it is because no one has ever shown them the right path, but a man, a real man, can lead them back to it. Juliette’s young husband decides to act like a male, gives her a good sharp slap, and Juliette is all at once transformed into a happy, contrite and submissive wife. Yvette joyfull accepts her lover’s demand that she be faithful and his imposing upon her a life of virtual seclusion. With a bit of luck, this experienced, middle-aged man would have brought her redemption. BB is a lost, pathetic child who needs a guide and protector. This cliché has proved its worth. It flatters masculine vanity.

(…) BB is neither perverse nor rebellious nor immoral, and that is why morality does not have a chance with her. Good and evil are part of conventions to which she would not even think of bowing.”

5 Responses to “Simone de Beauvoir – Brigitte Bardot and Lolita Syndrome”

  1. Upside-down Land 7th Dec 2020 at 2:41 pm #

    I finally got ahold of an early Bardot movie. Thanks for getting me onto “And God Created Woman”. Despite subtitles and terrible fight scenes I quite enjoyed it. More importantly, it served to help me understand why so many famous actresses do not appeal to me.
    Previously I recognized that it is axiomatic that any woman making it big in Hollywood had substantial ambition. I tended to find the screen appearance of their ambition off-putting – regardless of the role. Their ambition simply leaked out of them, no matter the part they were playing. Mind you, I have a high regard for Queen Elizabeth I and many other ambition women, but as a romantic ideal? In the context of myth-making in Hollywood? No.
    Surely Bardot’s sexiness pervades the film. Her delectable behind and sublime neck and coquettish attitude… But she falls short when it comes to her face. Like other stars with large features (think Sophia Loren and Ann Margaret), there is a Yang quality to it. Where other men claim to favor various parts of a woman’s body, I have always favored the face, with the neck and hands coming in second and third. Prior to “And God Created Woman” I had not identified this Yang-ness as the source of my disaffection for many female stars in Hollywood. It’s interesting how once a predilection is established there is little urge to revisit it.
    I discovered another feature of my predilections following this movie: the women I like in Hollywood tend to remain attractive at age 60 while the others do not. Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly are good examples of such women. Nataly Woods didn’t live long enough and Keira Knightley and Liv Tyler are still too young to judge this feature of my favor. We will see.
    I still don’t know where else I saw Bridgette Bardot. I only recalled that she wasn’t my type. Thanks for getting me on this path to better understanding one of my life-long dissatisfactions with Hollywood.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Byron's Muse 8th Dec 2020 at 2:51 pm #

      Hmm that’s a very interesting observation! I hadn’t thought about it before in that way, but it’s true that the “screen appearance of their ambition” can be “off-putting”. I don’t watch that many films in general, paintings, books and music interest me more. If I am going to sit down for an hour and a half, the film better be damn interesting! And lately I am especially disillusioned with the whole Hollywood thing, and I my attention is more at European films. I really enjoy the Kitchen Sink Realism in British cinema, the realness about it captivates me, and a lot of the films were on Youtube as it is. I may watch some period dramas merely for the aesthetic pleasure of the costumes. I never saw Brigitte’s features as large, sure she does have plump lips and big eyes, but all together it looks cute to me while Sophia Loren looks more like a dragon I dont know haha, she looks more dramatic and yang, as you said. It’s a beauty is in the eye of the beholder thing.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Wm. Allen 3rd Mar 2021 at 3:41 pm #

    BB, my first crush back in the late 50s. Thank you for bring back some memories.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Byron's Muse 3rd Mar 2021 at 6:39 pm #

      Thank you for reading, but no need to thank me for putting Brigitte Bardot on my blog: she is gorgeous!

      Liked by 2 people

      • Wm. Allen 3rd Mar 2021 at 7:15 pm #

        If gorgeous was all she was, my interest would not have been maintained. For instance, she was in some very lame films, but I understand for her is was more important that her friends were making the movie, than the quality of the story. That sort of appealed to me. Plus, she knew when to walk away from films, before they walked away from her. You have a pretty cool blog. I hope to become a regular reader of it.

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: